THE RETAIL BULLETIN - The home of retail news
Click here
Home Page
News Categories
Commentary
CX
Department Stores
Desert Island Stores
Electricals and Tech
Entertainment
Fashion
Food and Drink
General Merchandise
Grocery
Health and Beauty
Home and DIY
Interviews
People Matter
Retail Business Strategy
Property
Retail Solutions
Electricals & Technology
Sports and Leisure
TRB conference review
Christmas Ads
Shopping Centres, High Streets & Retail Parks
Uncategorized
Retail Events
People in Retail Awards 2024
Retail Ecom North
Retail HR North 2025
Retail Omnichannel Futures 2025
Retail HR Central 2025
The Future of The High Street 2025
Retail Ecom Central
Upcoming Retail Events
Past Retail Events
Retail Insights
Retail Solutions
Advertise
About
Contact
Subscribe for free
Terms and Policies
Privacy Policy
ASA upholds complaint over John Lewis Apple computer ad

The Advertising Standards Authority has ruled that John Lewis can no longer use an advert that promised a free 2-year guarantee on any Apple computer sold… View Article

GENERAL MERCHANDISE NEWS

ASA upholds complaint over John Lewis Apple computer ad

The Advertising Standards Authority has ruled that John Lewis can no longer use an advert that promised a free 2-year guarantee on any Apple computer sold by the retailer.

Dixons Retail had complained to the ASA that the advert was misleading as it believed the guarantees had always been included in the price and therefore could not be described as “free”.

John Lewis said its guarantees were an additional, separate service benefit to its customers and that it did not charge for guarantees or increase its prices to take account of any cost of the guarantee.  The retailer highlighted examples of “free” used to describe additional services from free delivery to free recycling and said the claim “free” was well understood by consumers.

However, the ASA rejected this argument, saying in its adjudication: “Marketers must not describe an element of a package as “free” if that element was included in the package price unless consumers were likely to regard it as an additional benefit because it had recently been added to the package without increasing its price.”

It continued: “To demonstrate that the “free” guarantees had recently been added to the products promoted in the ad without increasing their price, John Lewis would therefore need to show that those products had been on sale at the same price but without a guarantee, or with a less favourable, significantly shorter guarantee before the longer “free” guarantees had been added.”

The ASA ruled that the adverts must not appear again in their current form and told John Lewis not to refer to guarantees as “free” unless it could show that the products had been on sale at the same price without the guarantee, or with a significantly shorter guarantee.

Subscribe For Retail News